Did you speak with him privately after? I find it is a good exercise, if one wants to know the truth. But if you did not, this time I will gladly share with you what I have learned of his motives.
[...]
As for what you said in trial, I do not think it is the reason Sheila was dragged into it, though perhaps it is the reason the silly film was about divorce. However...
While the logical connection to the vague information you knew about his personal life was a bit ill-conceived and off the mark, I would say you did something quite important that was missed in the commotion over his marital habits. You did make an accusation based on the evidence found so far, and you were correct.
[ he perks up a little at that. everyone's been telling him how stupid his deductions are so often lately that it feels nice to have some acknowledgement that he was right for at least partly the right reason this time. especially from someone who almost definitely doesn't go throwing compliments around on a regular basis. ]
He told me that a shadow came to him during the week. Offered assistance in saving his hostage. He refused, but the shadow possessed him all the same. When he awoke, and saw Flayn, he felt a sense of rage that drove him to kill her.
But... what do we do, then? Last time we just had to wait out the two weeks, but I can't remember if there was even an ending date on the thing I signed for this... and I don't want to wait around again anyway!
We do not yet know the length of time, I believe, though I believe eight weeks is standard.
I suppose that is a question you must answer for yourself. Do you choose to comply with what is demanded of you, or do you choose to risk your life and your hostage’s life in order to resist?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Did you speak with him privately after? I find it is a good exercise, if one wants to know the truth. But if you did not, this time I will gladly share with you what I have learned of his motives.
[...]
As for what you said in trial, I do not think it is the reason Sheila was dragged into it, though perhaps it is the reason the silly film was about divorce. However...
While the logical connection to the vague information you knew about his personal life was a bit ill-conceived and off the mark, I would say you did something quite important that was missed in the commotion over his marital habits. You did make an accusation based on the evidence found so far, and you were correct.
no subject
And I guess... that's true...
[ he perks up a little at that. everyone's been telling him how stupid his deductions are so often lately that it feels nice to have some acknowledgement that he was right for at least partly the right reason this time. especially from someone who almost definitely doesn't go throwing compliments around on a regular basis. ]
no subject
[she drums her fingers against the table.]
He told me that a shadow came to him during the week. Offered assistance in saving his hostage. He refused, but the shadow possessed him all the same. When he awoke, and saw Flayn, he felt a sense of rage that drove him to kill her.
no subject
[ kind of like what futaba said about getting possessed and killing someone before... ]
How are we supposed to stop it from happening again, then?
[ and he's really not ready to deal with such a murky ethical grey area as a prosecutor. ]
no subject
no subject
no subject
I suppose that is a question you must answer for yourself. Do you choose to comply with what is demanded of you, or do you choose to risk your life and your hostage’s life in order to resist?
no subject
I... I don't know. If it was just me, that'd be one thing, but... I don't know if I can put Pops in danger like that.
no subject
If you said something differently, I would think less of you for choosing to come here in the first place.